"the plan"
DEV: need some more to the point, short and clear opening words here
will it ever get popular to agree ..and what if not
?
will it ever get popular to agree ..and what if not ?
nonkilling.world provides first 1 highly generic and then 4 focused approaches
designed to enable and endorse own, shared, mutual development along our shifting extents of engagement
and participation in the building of a preferable future today
explain more..
building a preferable future today of course means to build on a nonkilling future,
a future today where we have abandonded the tradition of resorting to killing each other
as a means for reaching our goals and fullfilling our satisfactions
for a preferable future to not end up in an unrealistic pipedream, we need better and more
substantial Human understandings that reveal fundamental circumstances
the first part here below
is an outlined pathway that connect the approaches into a
global consensus program, briefly explained stage by stage beginning at the basic reality program
and ending with the pre-Alpha.dev aim at real world systems to platform a future for Human agreement
explain more..
the way the Global Conseus program is designed, is that the goal of coming to own,
shared, mutual Human agreement is laid out along a default pathway that take our
agreements first to one stage of agreement, and then to the next
there is nothing to rule out that things can be agreed on in any other order, and it is
for doing so the basic Reality Program is made s an at ahnd generic outset to whatever
approach taken
( there's a sample on this in form of the "get, stay, make real" points at top of this page )
more words here
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
BASIC
what could happen
if we choosed to agree?
to begin with, at least with oneself
Human agreement can be easily misunderstood to consist first
of an agreement out here around and between us all, and then
whether or not someone or even if oneself do agree with that
especially in times of chnage, when evermore new things come
evermore faster to the evermore of us ourself, there's been less
chance to agree in any other way than the above
no prexistent agreement to cover for the new
all Human and World developments risks going evermore rampantly
out of control
having agreed on things we do not agree with, but still agree about
..as our own past have tought us we can nothing do about it
the Basic Reality Program
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL ACTUAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
RELATIONS
what if actually claiming
a really own right to agree?
and who else than oneself to actually stop it?
text
text
point
point
opportunity
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
Human & World Relations
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
BUILDING
and what if we just did it
for our very own sake
while at the very same, also for the sake of us all
text
text
point
point
opportunity
Real Future Building
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
VALUE
then what could start happen
after the day we claim own choice?
that day is actually already here, so the real question is
- do we really want the choice, or not?
text
text
point
point
opportunity
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
Value of Organized Efforts
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
SYSTEMS
is our systems rule to us out, or
are we to rule in our own systems?
today more than only possible
- actually instantly doable, effortlessly
text
text
point
point
opportunity
the Social Real World Systems
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
INSUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
DEV: need some more to the point, short and clear opening words here
will it ever get popular to agree ..and what if not
?
will it ever get popular to agree ..and what if not ?
nonkilling.world provides first 1 highly generic and then 4 focused approaches
designed to enable and endorse own, shared, mutual development along our shifting extents of engagement
and participation in the building of a preferable future today
explain more..
building a preferable future today of course means to build on a nonkilling future,
a future today where we have abandonded the tradition of resorting to killing each other
as a means for reaching our goals and fullfilling our satisfactions
for a preferable future to not end up in an unrealistic pipedream, we need better and more
substantial Human understandings that reveal fundamental circumstances
the first part here below
is an outlined pathway that connect the approaches into a
global consensus program, briefly explained stage by stage beginning at the basic reality program
and ending with the pre-Alpha.dev aim at real world systems to platform a future for Human agreement
explain more..
the way the Global Conseus program is designed, is that the goal of coming to own,
shared, mutual Human agreement is laid out along a default pathway that take our
agreements first to one stage of agreement, and then to the next
there is nothing to rule out that things can be agreed on in any other order, and it is
for doing so the basic Reality Program is made s an at ahnd generic outset to whatever
approach taken
( there's a sample on this in form of the "get, stay, make real" points at top of this page )
more words here
BASIC
REALITY
PROGRAM
#human_agreement
what could happen
if we choosed to agree?
to begin with, at least with oneself
Human agreement can be easily misunderstood to consist first
of an agreement out here around and between us all, and then
whether or not someone or even if oneself do agree with that
especially in times of chnage, when evermore new things come
evermore faster to the evermore of us ourself, there's been less
chance to agree in any other way than the above
no prexistent agreement to cover for the new
all Human and World developments risks going evermore rampantly
out of control
having agreed on things we do not agree with, but still agree about
..as our own past have tought us we can nothing do about it
#own_choice
the Basic Reality Program
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL ACTUAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
RELATIONS
what if actually claiming
a really own right to agree?
and who else than oneself to actually stop it?
text
text
point
point
opportunity
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
Human & World Relations
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
BUILDING
and what if we just did it
for our very own sake
while at the very same, also for the sake of us all
text
text
point
point
opportunity
Real Future Building
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
VALUE
then what could start happen
after the day we claim own choice?
that day is actually already here, so the real question is
- do we really want the choice, or not?
text
text
point
point
opportunity
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
Value of Organized Efforts
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
INDUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
SYSTEMS
is our systems rule to us out, or
are we to rule in our own systems?
today more than only possible
- actually instantly doable, effortlessly
text
text
point
point
opportunity
the Social Real World Systems
aimed at sharing of self-agreement as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreement
INSUSTRIAL SCALE
HUMAN SACRIFICE
PLAUSIBEL
REAL SANITY
THE HUMAN
AGREEMENT
ORIGINALLY
OWN CHOICE
REAL
HUMAN RIGHT
real world ⓐpplications
explorethe basic reality program is oriented around the absence
of own shared mutual faculty for telling aparat Human and idea, which here
at left is treated as a circusmtance that is preventable and recoverable from - while
what otherwise ensue towards the right, end up in
the rightmost instance as a persistent, but also that preventable and recoverable circumstance
CONSENSUS GOAL
when in context of global consensus
- the main goal with the Basic Reality Program,
is to provide for mutually established Human Agreement
✔ ensure that all parties have made one's own self-agreement
✔ ensure there's agreement to use the /choice for all and any exceptions
✔ have at least considered making own choice on the last 3 instances
beware The Human Agreement naturally allow for everyone's
own self-agreement in either of agreeing with it, or against it
( which ever opted for, it's still one's own self-agreement )
CONSENSUS PLAN [ show [ hide
Originally Own Choice solve the above matter, by means of
having the choice naturally calls for distinction between
Human and ideas, whereas if to have the choice; oneself
become quite destined to accept at least the basic logic
of The Human Agreement
( there is of course also the choice to Not choose, whereby;
naturally denying oneself any global consensus participation )
with the above settled, the next is to address the 3 instances following directly after the /agree and the /choice instances, whereby these 3 following instances is positoned as an outset at the begin, for the purpose of dealing with them in ways that allow to sustain own, shared and mutual self-agreement
by design, this also puts the /sanity instance at focal position,
making it a target to /right and /sacrifice and an outset to
/agree and /choice
▼
RECOMMENDED HOW-TO [ show [ hide
A
to begin with familiarizing oneself with the basic reality program,
for example by kicking it off with the ABC of real future building
found at top of this page
use the basic reality programs real world ⓐpp's
to get the easyness of the works of this all
( these two things takes but a few minutes only )
✔
once got the basic works of it,
especially if already claimed own Real Human Right
B
then the straight to the point next thing to do,
would be to not lose one's own new gainings; but instead to
preserve one's own stance and integrity most effectively by seeking
shared and mutual agreement at the level of sound Human & World
Relations
now, the maybe least recognized
?
Human & World Relations
oriented around mutually genuine self-agreement on own and shared development of Human & World Relations along a working faculty for telling apart Human, and ideas
/right/RELATIONS
/right/RELATIONS#sanity
/sacrifice/RELATIONS
/sacrifice/RELATIONS#sanity
/sanity/RELATIONS
/agree/RELATIONS#sanity
/agree/RELATIONS
/choice/RELATIONS#sanity
/choice#RELATIONS
CONSENSUS GOAL
the main goal here is aimed at the nonexistence of real Human right
and the vast global investment in Human Sacrifice - to the purpose of
sustaining plausibel sanity as to allow for remaining with already established
own, shared mutually geneuine self-agreement and originally own choice
Already Provided for
mutually genuine self-agreement is here seen as provided for at the preceeding programs two first instances - and is here sought to be preserved and keept building on
Real Future Building
based on social sharing of self-agreements as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreements
/sanity/BUILDING
/sanity/BUILDING#choice
/agree/BUILDING
/agree/BUILDING#choice
/choice/BUILDING
/right/BUILDING
/right/BUILDING#choice
/sacrifice/BUILDING
/sacrifice/BUILDING#choice
Already Provided for
mutually genuine self-agreement is here seen as provided for at the preceeding programs two first instances - and is here sought to keep building on
Human & World Relations
oriented around mutually genuine self-agreement on own and shared development of Human & World Relations in recognition of a working faculty for telling apart Human, and ideas
Value of Organized Efforts
based on social sharing of self-agreements as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreements
/choice/VALUE#sacrifice
/choice/VALUE
/right/VALUE#sacrifice
/right/VALUE
/sacrifice/VALUE
/sanity/VALUE
/sanity/VALUE#sacrifice
/agree/VALUE
/agree/VALUE#sacrifice
Already Provided for
mutually genuine self-agreement is here seen as provided for at the preceeding programs two first instances - and is here sought to keep building on
Already Provided for
mutually genuine self-agreement is here seen as provided for at the preceeding programs two first instances - and is here sought to keep building on
Already Provided for
based on social sharing of self-agreements as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreements
Social Real World Systems
based on social sharing of self-agreements as a natural means for the creation and realization of mutually genuine agreements
/sacrifice/SYSTEMS#agree
/sacrifice/SYSTEMS
/sanity/SYSTEMS#agree
/sanity/SYSTEMS
/agree/SYSTEMS
/choice/SYSTEMS/#agree
/choice/SYSTEMS
/right/SYSTEMS#agree
/right/SYSTEMS
Already Provided for
mutually genuine self-agreement is here seen as provided for at the preceeding programs two first instances - and is here sought to keep building on
Human & World Relations
oriented around mutually genuine self-agreement on own and shared development of Human & World Relations in recognition of a working faculty for telling apart Human, and ideas
PRE-APLHA.DEV NOTE
to beware of is that some of the program instances deal with an indefinite amount of so called "hard problems" and "paradoxes" traditionally found along perception cultures such as for example 'sciences', 'philosophy', 'logic'
in actual, some instances surpasses far beyond the traditional limits of "hard problems" and "paradoxes", all the way to the very virge of what ever may be at all physically possible
in effect, would one's own previous way's of minding be colored by tradinional "hard problems" or "paradoxes", one might find new ways through the challenges of mind simply by resorting to accepting an own realization for that "ideas are not Humans", and then build ways of thought upon that as an everlasting basis of circumstances from which there will never occur any sober real Human escape, ever
to remember is that
oneself always have the choice
- including one's own choice to have the choice, or not